So you want to answer the Call for Papers? It includes tips for this content and presentation of this abstract, along with examples of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 abstract selection committee when it comes to ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you’d like to present in the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution towards the historical literature. It is almost always restricted to 250-500 words. Your message limit can be challenging: some graduate students try not to fret on the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract in the eleventh hour, which regularly hurts their chances of being accepted; other students attempt to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, that can easily be equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most often invited to present their research. If you are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Follow the guidelines that are basic and avoid common pitfalls and you’ll greatly improve your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, as well as perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how exactly to present quotes, simple tips to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or perhaps not. Be sure that you strictly stay glued to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it really is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read a lot of these things and do not look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Ensure that you orient your topic that is abstract to any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive prepositional phrasing.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the following questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What is your thesis/argument? It should be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you are using primary source material. So how exactly does your paper squeeze into the historiography? What are you doing in the area of study and how does your paper subscribe to it? How come it matter? We know this issue is very important for you, why should it be important to the abstract selection committee?
You should be as specific that you can, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing an excessive amount of narrative or over explaining. Say what you should say and absolutely nothing more.
Maintain your audience in your mind. How much background you give on a subject will depend on the conference. Is the conference a broad humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something like that more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch ought to be worthy of the specificity for the conference: the more specific the topic, the less broad background you need certainly to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its final presentation is error free. The editing phase can also be the best time to see your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The draft that is final be linear and clear also it should read smoothly. If you are tripping over something while reading, the selection that is abstract will as well. Ask another graduate student to read your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language should be professional and your style should abide by standards that are academic. Contractions may be appealing due to the expressed word limits, but they should really be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to use the name that is author’s title of work (in a choice of italics or quotation marks) in the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, can be posed in your abstract, you need https://domyhomework.services to avoid writing one or more (maybe two, if really really good). If you do pose a question or two, make certain you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you are posing an obvious rhetorical question, you must never just let a question hang there. Too many questions takes up too much space and leaves less room if you are going to address one or all in your paper and if you even know the answers to them for you to develop your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering. Remember, you are not expected to have previously written your conference paper, however you are required to own done enough research that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes that you are prepared to write about a specific topic. Prove that you have inked so.
Language that will help you be as specific as you can in presenting your argument is fantastic but don’t get the readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll certainly be reading a lot of abstracts and will not wish to wade through the unnecessary language. Ensure that it stays simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize they truly are doing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Consider it a few more and then write. Other times, students write carelessly and do not proofread. Make certain each sentence is exclusive and that it contributes to the flow of the abstract.
The committee that is abstract not require to be reminded regarding the grand sweep of history to be able to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.
The samples below represent the five scoring samples that are highest submitted to the selection committee when it comes to ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two of the samples below were subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a review that is peer before publication.